Received: from relay2.UU.NET (relay2.UU.NET [192.48.96.7]) by keeper.albany.net (8.7.1/8.7.1) with ESMTP id UAA28128 for <dwarner@albany.net>; Mon, 15 Jan 1996 20:58:38 -0500 (EST)
Received: from garcia.com by relay2.UU.NET with SMTP
id QQzyru05264; Mon, 15 Jan 1996 20:33:52 -0500 (EST)
Received: from (localhost) by garcia.com (5.x/SMI-SVR4)
id AA12828; Mon, 15 Jan 1996 20:34:08 -0500
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 1996 20:34:08 -0500
Errors-To: dwarner@albany.net
Message-Id: <30FA5740.DA8@mail.rust.net>
Errors-To: dwarner@albany.net
Reply-To: lightwave@garcia.com
Originator: lightwave@garcia.com
Sender: lightwave@garcia.com
Precedence: bulk
From: PJ Foley <pjfoley@Fe3.rust.net>
To: Multiple recipients of list <lightwave@garcia.com>
Subject: LW4.0C Intel-DOF Broken?
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Status: RO
X-Status:
I've been using LW4.0 Rev C on Intel/NT for a few days now, and
have noticed that depth of field either does not work, or is not
nearly as responsive, or I have totally forgotten how it works.
I've used it before with no hang-ups at all on Amiga versions,
but have not tried it on the NT versions until recently.